Библиотека сайта или "Мой Linux Documentation Project"
To answer that question, let's go back to the basics for a moment. Computers process information. In order for this to happen, there are some prerequisites:
A computer (Obviously!).
Some information to process (Also obvious!).
A program to do the processing (Still pretty obvious!).
Take the computer, for example. While it needs things like electricity and a cool, dry place to operate, it also needs access to the other two items — information and programs — in order to do its thing. The way to get information and programs into a computer is to place them in the computer's mass storage. These days, mass storage invariably means a disk drive. Putting information and programs on the disk drive means that they are stored as files. So much for the computer's part in this.
OK, let's look at the information. Does information have any particular needs? Well, it needs sufficient space on the disk drive, but more importantly, it needs to be in the proper format for the program that will be processing it. That's it for information.
Finally, we have the program. What does it need? Like the information, it needs sufficient disk space on the disk drive. But there are many other things that it may need:
It may need information to process, in the correct format, named properly, and in the appropriate area on a disk drive somewhere.
It may need one or more configuration files. These are files that control the program's behavior and permit some level of customization. Like the information, these files must be in the proper format, named properly, and in the appropriate area on a disk. We'll be referring to them by their other name — config files — throughout the book.
It may need work areas on a disk, named properly, and located in the appropriate area.
It may even need other programs, each with their own requirements.
Although not strictly required by the program itself, the program may come with one or more files containing documentation. These files can be very handy for the humans trying to get the program to do their bidding!
As you can imagine, this can get pretty complicated. It's not so bad once everything is set up properly, but how do things get set up properly in the first place? There are two possibilities:
After reading the documentation that comes with the program you'd like to use, you copy the various programs, configuration files, and information onto your computer, making sure they are all named correctly, are located in the proper place, and that there is sufficient disk space to hold them all. You make the appropriate changes to the configuration file(s). Finally, you run any setup programs that are necessary, giving them whatever information they require to do their job.
You let the computer do it.
Some people think the second alternative is easier. RPM was made for them.
When you consider that computers are very good at keeping track of large amounts of data, the idea of giving your computer the job of riding herd over 20,000 files seems like a good one. And that's exactly what package management software does. But what is a "package"?
A package in the computer sense is very similar to a package in the physical sense. Both are methods of keeping related objects together in the same place. Both need to be opened before the contents can be used. Both can have a "packing slip" taped to the side, identifying the contents.
Normally, package management systems take all the various files containing programs, data, documentation, and configuration information, and place them in one specially formatted file — a package file. In the case of RPM, the package file is sometimes called a "package", a ".rpm file", or even an "RPM". All mean the same thing — a package containing software meant to be installed using RPM.
What types of software are normally found in a package? There are no hard and fast rules, but normally a package's contents consist of one of the following types of software:
A collection of one or more programs that perform a single well-defined task. This is normally what people think of as an "application". Word processors and programming languages would fit into this category.
A specific part of an operating system. Examples might be system initialization scripts, a particular command shell, or the software required to support a web server, for example.
One of the most obvious benefits to having a package is that the package is one easily manageable chunk. If you move it from one place to another, there's no risk of any part getting left behind. But although this is the most obvious advantage, it's not the biggest one.
The biggest advantage is that the package can contain the knowledge about what it takes to install itself on your computer. And if the package contains the steps required to install itself, the package can also contain the steps required to uninstall itself. What used to be a painful manual process is now a straightforward procedure. What used to be a mass of 20,000 files becomes a couple hundred packages.
A couple hundred? Even though the use of packages has decreased the complexity of managing a system by an order of magnitude, it hasn't yet gotten to the level of being a "no-brainer". It's still necessary to keep track of what packages are installed on your system. And if there are some packages that require other packages in order to install or operate correctly, these should be tracked as well.
If you start looking at a computer system as a collection of packages, you'll find that a distinct set of operations will take place on those packages time and time again:
New packages are installed. Maybe it's a spreadsheet you'll use to keep track of expenses, or the latest shoot-em-up game, but in either case it's new and you want it.
Old packages are replaced with newer versions. Whoever wrote the word processor you use daily, comes out with a new version. You'll probably want to install the new version and remove the old one.
Packages are removed entirely. Perhaps that over-hyped strategy game just didn't cut it. You have better things to do with that disk space, so get rid of it!
Just as there are certain operations that are performed on packages, there are also certain types of information that will make it easier to make sense of the packages installed on your system:
Certainly you'd like to be able to see what packages are installed. It's easy to forget if that fax program you tried a few months ago is still installed or not.
It would be nice to be able to get more detailed information on a specific package. This might consist of anything from the date the package was installed, to a list of files it installed on your system.
Being able to access this information in a variety of ways can be helpful, too. Instead of simply finding out what files a package installed, it might be handy to be able to name a particular file and find out which package installed it.
If this amount of detail is possible, then it should be possible to see if the way a package is presently installed varies from the way it was originally installed. It's not at all unusual to make a mistake and delete one file — or a hundred. Being able to tell if one or more packages are missing files could greatly simplify the process of getting an ailing system back on its feet again.
Files containing configuration information can be a real headache. If it were possible to pay extra attention to these files and make sure any changes made to them weren't lost, life would certainly be a lot easier.
|RPM and Computer Users — How to Use RPM to Effectively Manage Your Computer||Up||Package Management: How to Do It?|
Только зарегистрированные пользователи могут оценивать и комментировать статьи.