Библиотека сайта rus-linux.net
2. Process and Interrupt Management
2.1 Task Structure and Process Table
Every process under Linux is dynamically allocated a struct task_struct
structure. The maximum number of processes which can be created on Linux
is limited only by the amount of physical memory present, and is
equal to (see kernel/fork.c:fork_init()
):
/*
* The default maximum number of threads is set to a safe
* value: the thread structures can take up at most half
* of memory.
*/
max_threads = mempages / (THREAD_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE) / 2;
which, on IA32 architecture, basically means num_physpages/4
. As an example,
on a 512M machine, you can create 32k threads. This is a considerable
improvement over the 4k-epsilon limit for older (2.2 and earlier) kernels.
Moreover, this can be changed at runtime using the KERN_MAX_THREADS sysctl(2),
or simply using procfs interface to kernel tunables:
# cat /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max
32764
# echo 100000 > /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max
# cat /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max
100000
# gdb -q vmlinux /proc/kcore
Core was generated by `BOOT_IMAGE=240ac18 ro root=306 video=matrox:vesa:0x118'.
#0 0x0 in ?? ()
(gdb) p max_threads
$1 = 100000
The set of processes on the Linux system is represented as a collection of
struct task_struct
structures which are linked in two ways:
- as a hashtable, hashed by pid, and
- as a circular, doubly-linked list using
p->next_task
andp->prev_task
pointers.
The hashtable is called pidhash[]
and is defined in
include/linux/sched.h
:
/* PID hashing. (shouldnt this be dynamic?) */
#define PIDHASH_SZ (4096 >> 2)
extern struct task_struct *pidhash[PIDHASH_SZ];
#define pid_hashfn(x) ((((x) >> 8) ^ (x)) & (PIDHASH_SZ - 1))
The tasks are hashed by their pid value and the above hashing function is
supposed to distribute the elements uniformly in their domain
(0
to PID_MAX-1
). The hashtable is used to quickly find a task by given pid,
using find_task_pid()
inline from include/linux/sched.h
:
static inline struct task_struct *find_task_by_pid(int pid)
{
struct task_struct *p, **htable = &pidhash[pid_hashfn(pid)];
for(p = *htable; p && p->pid != pid; p = p->pidhash_next)
;
return p;
}
The tasks on each hashlist (i.e. hashed to the same value) are linked
by p->pidhash_next/pidhash_pprev
which are used by hash_pid()
and
unhash_pid()
to insert and remove a given process into the hashtable.
These are done under protection of the read-write spinlock called tasklist_lock
taken for WRITE.
The circular doubly-linked list that uses p->next_task/prev_task
is
maintained so that one could go through all tasks on the system easily.
This is achieved by the for_each_task()
macro from include/linux/sched.h
:
#define for_each_task(p) \
for (p = &init_task ; (p = p->next_task) != &init_task ; )
Users of for_each_task()
should take tasklist_lock for READ.
Note that for_each_task()
is using init_task
to mark the beginning (and end)
of the list - this is safe because the idle task (pid 0) never exits.
The modifiers of the process hashtable or/and the process table links,
notably fork()
, exit()
and ptrace()
, must take tasklist_lock
for WRITE. What is
more interesting is that the writers must also disable interrupts on the
local CPU. The reason for this is not trivial: the send_sigio()
function walks the
task list and thus takes tasklist_lock
for READ, and it is called from
kill_fasync()
in interrupt context. This is why writers must disable
interrupts while readers don't need to.
Now that we understand how the task_struct
structures are linked together,
let us examine the members of task_struct
. They loosely correspond to the
members of UNIX 'struct proc' and 'struct user' combined together.
The other versions of UNIX separated the task state information into one part which should be kept memory-resident at all times (called 'proc structure' which includes process state, scheduling information etc.) and another part which is only needed when the process is running (called 'u area' which includes file descriptor table, disk quota information etc.). The only reason for such ugly design was that memory was a very scarce resource. Modern operating systems (well, only Linux at the moment but others, e.g. FreeBSD seem to improve in this direction towards Linux) do not need such separation and therefore maintain process state in a kernel memory-resident data structure at all times.
The task_struct structure is declared in include/linux/sched.h
and is
currently 1680 bytes in size.
The state field is declared as:
volatile long state; /* -1 unrunnable, 0 runnable, >0 stopped */
#define TASK_RUNNING 0
#define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 1
#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 2
#define TASK_ZOMBIE 4
#define TASK_STOPPED 8
#define TASK_EXCLUSIVE 32
Why is TASK_EXCLUSIVE
defined as 32 and not 16? Because 16 was used up by
TASK_SWAPPING
and I forgot to shift TASK_EXCLUSIVE
up when I removed
all references to TASK_SWAPPING
(sometime in 2.3.x).
The volatile
in p->state
declaration means it can be modified
asynchronously (from interrupt handler):
- TASK_RUNNING: means the task is "supposed to be" on the run
queue. The reason it may not yet be on the runqueue is that marking a task as
TASK_RUNNING
and placing it on the runqueue is not atomic. You need to hold therunqueue_lock
read-write spinlock for read in order to look at the runqueue. If you do so, you will then see that every task on the runqueue is inTASK_RUNNING
state. However, the converse is not true for the reason explained above. Similarly, drivers can mark themselves (or rather the process context they run in) asTASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
(orTASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
) and then callschedule()
, which will then remove it from the runqueue (unless there is a pending signal, in which case it is left on the runqueue). - TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE: means the task is sleeping but can be woken up by a signal or by expiry of a timer.
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE: same as
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
, except it cannot be woken up. - TASK_ZOMBIE: task has terminated but has not had its status collected
(
wait()
-ed for) by the parent (natural or by adoption). - TASK_STOPPED: task was stopped, either due to job control signals or due to ptrace(2).
- TASK_EXCLUSIVE: this is not a separate state but can be OR-ed to
either one of
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
orTASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
. This means that when this task is sleeping on a wait queue with many other tasks, it will be woken up alone instead of causing "thundering herd" problem by waking up all the waiters.
Task flags contain information about the process states which are not mutually exclusive:
unsigned long flags; /* per process flags, defined below */
/*
* Per process flags
*/
#define PF_ALIGNWARN 0x00000001 /* Print alignment warning msgs */
/* Not implemented yet, only for 486*/
#define PF_STARTING 0x00000002 /* being created */
#define PF_EXITING 0x00000004 /* getting shut down */
#define PF_FORKNOEXEC 0x00000040 /* forked but didn't exec */
#define PF_SUPERPRIV 0x00000100 /* used super-user privileges */
#define PF_DUMPCORE 0x00000200 /* dumped core */
#define PF_SIGNALED 0x00000400 /* killed by a signal */
#define PF_MEMALLOC 0x00000800 /* Allocating memory */
#define PF_VFORK 0x00001000 /* Wake up parent in mm_release */
#define PF_USEDFPU 0x00100000 /* task used FPU this quantum (SMP) */
The fields p->has_cpu
, p->processor
, p->counter
, p->priority
, p->policy
and
p->rt_priority
are related to the scheduler and will be looked at later.
The fields p->mm
and p->active_mm
point respectively to the process' address space
described by mm_struct
structure and to the active address space if the
process doesn't have a real one (e.g. kernel threads). This helps minimise
TLB flushes on switching address spaces when the task is scheduled out.
So, if we are scheduling-in the kernel thread (which has no p->mm
) then its
next->active_mm
will be set to the prev->active_mm
of the task that was
scheduled-out, which will be the same as prev->mm
if prev->mm != NULL
.
The address space can be shared between threads if CLONE_VM
flag is passed
to the clone(2) system call or by means of vfork(2) system call.
The fields p->exec_domain
and p->personality
relate to the personality of
the task, i.e. to the way certain system calls behave in order to emulate the
"personality" of foreign flavours of UNIX.
The field p->fs
contains filesystem information, which under Linux means
three pieces of information:
- root directory's dentry and mountpoint,
- alternate root directory's dentry and mountpoint,
- current working directory's dentry and mountpoint.
This structure also includes a reference count because it can be shared
between cloned tasks when CLONE_FS
flag is passed to the clone(2) system
call.
The field p->files
contains the file descriptor table. This too can be
shared between tasks, provided CLONE_FILES
is specified with clone(2) system
call.
The field p->sig
contains signal handlers and can be shared between cloned
tasks by means of CLONE_SIGHAND
.
2.2 Creation and termination of tasks and kernel threads
Different books on operating systems define a "process" in different ways, starting from "instance of a program in execution" and ending with "that which is produced by clone(2) or fork(2) system calls". Under Linux, there are three kinds of processes:
- the idle thread(s),
- kernel threads,
- user tasks.
The idle thread is created at compile time for the first CPU; it is then
"manually" created for each CPU by means of arch-specific
fork_by_hand()
in arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
, which unrolls the fork(2) system
call by hand (on some archs). Idle tasks share one init_task structure but
have a private TSS structure, in the per-CPU array init_tss
. Idle tasks all have
pid = 0 and no other task can share pid, i.e. use CLONE_PID
flag to clone(2).
Kernel threads are created using kernel_thread()
function which invokes
the clone(2) system call in kernel mode. Kernel threads usually have no user
address space, i.e. p->mm = NULL
, because they explicitly do exit_mm()
, e.g.
via daemonize()
function. Kernel threads can always access kernel address
space directly. They are allocated pid numbers in the low range. Running at
processor's ring 0 (on x86, that is) implies that the kernel threads enjoy all I/O privileges
and cannot be pre-empted by the scheduler.
User tasks are created by means of clone(2) or fork(2) system calls, both of which internally invoke kernel/fork.c:do_fork().
Let us understand what happens when a user process makes a fork(2) system
call. Although fork(2) is architecture-dependent due to the
different ways of passing user stack and registers, the actual underlying
function do_fork()
that does the job is portable and is located at
kernel/fork.c
.
The following steps are done:
- Local variable
retval
is set to-ENOMEM
, as this is the value whicherrno
should be set to if fork(2) fails to allocate a new task structure. - If
CLONE_PID
is set inclone_flags
then return an error (-EPERM
), unless the caller is the idle thread (during boot only). So, normal user threads cannot passCLONE_PID
to clone(2) and expect it to succeed. For fork(2), this is irrelevant asclone_flags
is set toSIFCHLD
- this is only relevant whendo_fork()
is invoked fromsys_clone()
which passes theclone_flags
from the value requested from userspace. -
current->vfork_sem
is initialised (it is later cleared in the child). This is used bysys_vfork()
(vfork(2) system call, corresponds toclone_flags = CLONE_VFORK|CLONE_VM|SIGCHLD
) to make the parent sleep until the child doesmm_release()
, for example as a result ofexec()
ing another program or exit(2)-ing. - A new task structure is allocated using arch-dependent
alloc_task_struct()
macro. On x86 it is just a gfp atGFP_KERNEL
priority. This is the first reason why fork(2) system call may sleep. If this allocation fails, we return-ENOMEM
. - All the values from current process' task structure are copied into
the new one, using structure assignment
*p = *current
. Perhaps this should be replaced by a memcpy? Later on, the fields that should not be inherited by the child are set to the correct values. - Big kernel lock is taken as the rest of the code would otherwise be non-reentrant.
- If the parent has user resources (a concept of UID, Linux is flexible
enough to make it a question rather than a fact), then verify if the
user exceeded
RLIMIT_NPROC
soft limit - if so, fail with-EAGAIN
, if not, increment the count of processes by given uidp->user->count
. - If the system-wide number of tasks exceeds the value of the tunable
max_threads, fail with
-EAGAIN
. - If the binary being executed belongs to a modularised execution domain, increment the corresponding module's reference count.
- If the binary being executed belongs to a modularised binary format, increment the corresponding module's reference count.
- The child is marked as 'has not execed' (
p->did_exec = 0
) - The child is marked as 'not-swappable' (
p->swappable = 0
) - The child is put into 'uninterruptible sleep' state, i.e.
p->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
(TODO: why is this done? I think it's not needed - get rid of it, Linus confirms it is not needed) - The child's
p->flags
are set according to the value of clone_flags; for plain fork(2), this will bep->flags = PF_FORKNOEXEC
. - The child's pid
p->pid
is set using the fast algorithm inkernel/fork.c:get_pid()
(TODO:lastpid_lock
spinlock can be made redundant sinceget_pid()
is always called under big kernel lock fromdo_fork()
, also remove flags argument ofget_pid()
, patch sent to Alan on 20/06/2000 - followup later). - The rest of the code in
do_fork()
initialises the rest of child's task structure. At the very end, the child's task structure is hashed into thepidhash
hashtable and the child is woken up (TODO:wake_up_process(p)
setsp->state = TASK_RUNNING
and adds the process to the runq, therefore we probably didn't need to setp->state
toTASK_RUNNING
earlier on indo_fork()
). The interesting part is settingp->exit_signal
toclone_flags & CSIGNAL
, which for fork(2) means justSIGCHLD
and settingp->pdeath_signal
to 0. Thepdeath_signal
is used when a process 'forgets' the original parent (by dying) and can be set/get by means ofPR_GET/SET_PDEATHSIG
commands of prctl(2) system call (You might argue that the way the value ofpdeath_signal
is returned via userspace pointer argument in prctl(2) is a bit silly - mea culpa, after Andries Brouwer updated the manpage it was too late to fix ;)
Thus tasks are created. There are several ways for tasks to terminate:
- by making exit(2) system call;
- by being delivered a signal with default disposition to die;
- by being forced to die under certain exceptions;
- by calling bdflush(2) with
func == 1
(this is Linux-specific, for compatibility with old distributions that still had the 'update' line in/etc/inittab
- nowadays the work of update is done by kernel threadkupdate
).
Functions implementing system calls under Linux are prefixed with sys_
,
but they are usually concerned only with argument checking or arch-specific
ways to pass some information and the actual work is done by do_
functions.
So it is with sys_exit()
which calls do_exit()
to do the work. Although,
other parts of the kernel sometimes invoke sys_exit()
while they should really
call do_exit()
.
The function do_exit()
is found in kernel/exit.c
. The points to note about
do_exit()
:
- Uses global kernel lock (locks but doesn't unlock).
- Calls
schedule()
at the end, which never returns. - Sets the task state to
TASK_ZOMBIE
. - Notifies any child with
current->pdeath_signal
, if not 0. - Notifies the parent with a
current->exit_signal
, which is usually equal toSIGCHLD
. - Releases resources allocated by fork, closes open files etc.
- On architectures that use lazy FPU switching (ia64, mips, mips64) (TODO: remove 'flags' argument of sparc, sparc64), do whatever the hardware requires to pass the FPU ownership (if owned by current) to "none".
2.3 Linux Scheduler
The job of a scheduler is to arbitrate access to the current CPU between
multiple processes. The scheduler is implemented in the 'main kernel file'
kernel/sched.c
. The corresponding header file include/linux/sched.h
is
included (either explicitly or indirectly) by virtually every kernel source
file.
The fields of task structure relevant to scheduler include:
-
p->need_resched
: this field is set ifschedule()
should be invoked at the 'next opportunity'. -
p->counter
: number of clock ticks left to run in this scheduling slice, decremented by a timer. When this field becomes lower than or equal to zero, it is reset to 0 andp->need_resched
is set. This is also sometimes called 'dynamic priority' of a process because it can change by itself. -
p->priority
: the process' static priority, only changed through well-known system calls like nice(2), POSIX.1b sched_setparam(2) or 4.4BSD/SVR4 setpriority(2). -
p->rt_priority
: realtime priority -
p->policy
: the scheduling policy, specifies which scheduling class the task belongs to. Tasks can change their scheduling class using the sched_setscheduler(2) system call. The valid values areSCHED_OTHER
(traditional UNIX process),SCHED_FIFO
(POSIX.1b FIFO realtime process) andSCHED_RR
(POSIX round-robin realtime process). One can also ORSCHED_YIELD
to any of these values to signify that the process decided to yield the CPU, for example by calling sched_yield(2) system call. A FIFO realtime process will run until either a) it blocks on I/O, b) it explicitly yields the CPU or c) it is preempted by another realtime process with a higherp->rt_priority
value.SCHED_RR
is the same asSCHED_FIFO
, except that when its timeslice expires it goes back to the end of the runqueue.
The scheduler's algorithm is simple, despite the great apparent complexity
of the schedule()
function. The function is complex because it implements
three scheduling algorithms in one and also because of the subtle
SMP-specifics.
The apparently 'useless' gotos in schedule()
are there for a purpose - to
generate the best optimised (for i386) code. Also, note that scheduler
(like most of the kernel) was completely rewritten for 2.4, therefore the
discussion below does not apply to 2.2 or earlier kernels.
Let us look at the function in detail:
- If
current->active_mm == NULL
then something is wrong. Current process, even a kernel thread (current->mm == NULL
) must have a validp->active_mm
at all times. - If there is something to do on the
tq_scheduler
task queue, process it now. Task queues provide a kernel mechanism to schedule execution of functions at a later time. We shall look at it in details elsewhere. - Initialise local variables
prev
andthis_cpu
to current task and current CPU respectively. - Check if
schedule()
was invoked from interrupt handler (due to a bug) and panic if so. - Release the global kernel lock.
- If there is some work to do via softirq mechanism, do it now.
- Initialise local pointer
struct schedule_data *sched_data
to point to per-CPU (cacheline-aligned to prevent cacheline ping-pong) scheduling data area, which contains the TSC value oflast_schedule
and the pointer to last scheduled task structure (TODO:sched_data
is used on SMP only but why doesinit_idle()
initialises it on UP as well?). -
runqueue_lock
spinlock is taken. Note that we usespin_lock_irq()
because inschedule()
we guarantee that interrupts are enabled. Therefore, when we unlockrunqueue_lock
, we can just re-enable them instead of saving/restoring eflags (spin_lock_irqsave/restore
variant). - task state machine: if the task is in
TASK_RUNNING
state, it is left alone; if it is inTASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state and a signal is pending, it is moved intoTASK_RUNNING
state. In all other cases, it is deleted from the runqueue. -
next
(best candidate to be scheduled) is set to the idle task of this cpu. However, the goodness of this candidate is set to a very low value (-1000), in hope that there is someone better than that. - If the
prev
(current) task is inTASK_RUNNING
state, then the current goodness is set to its goodness and it is marked as a better candidate to be scheduled than the idle task. - Now the runqueue is examined and a goodness of each process that can
be scheduled on this cpu is compared with current value; the
process with highest goodness wins. Now the concept of "can be
scheduled on this cpu" must be clarified: on UP, every process on
the runqueue is eligible to be scheduled; on SMP, only process not
already running on another cpu is eligible to be scheduled on this
cpu. The goodness is calculated by a function called
goodness()
, which treats realtime processes by making their goodness very high (1000 + p->rt_priority
), this being greater than 1000 guarantees that noSCHED_OTHER
process can win; so they only contend with other realtime processes that may have a greaterp->rt_priority
. The goodness function returns 0 if the process' time slice (p->counter
) is over. For non-realtime processes, the initial value of goodness is set top->counter
- this way, the process is less likely to get CPU if it already had it for a while, i.e. interactive processes are favoured more than CPU bound number crunchers. The arch-specific constantPROC_CHANGE_PENALTY
attempts to implement "cpu affinity" (i.e. give advantage to a process on the same CPU). It also gives a slight advantage to processes with mm pointing to currentactive_mm
or to processes with no (user) address space, i.e. kernel threads. - if the current value of goodness is 0 then the entire list of
processes (not just the ones on the runqueue!) is examined and their dynamic
priorities are recalculated using simple algorithm:
Note that the we drop the
recalculate: { struct task_struct *p; spin_unlock_irq(&runqueue_lock); read_lock(&tasklist_lock); for_each_task(p) p->counter = (p->counter >> 1) + p->priority; read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); spin_lock_irq(&runqueue_lock); }
runqueue_lock
before we recalculate. The reason is that we go through entire set of processes; this can take a long time, during which theschedule()
could be called on another CPU and select a process with goodness good enough for that CPU, whilst we on this CPU were forced to recalculate. Ok, admittedly this is somewhat inconsistent because while we (on this CPU) are selecting a process with the best goodness,schedule()
running on another CPU could be recalculating dynamic priorities. - From this point on it is certain that
next
points to the task to be scheduled, so we initialisenext->has_cpu
to 1 andnext->processor
tothis_cpu
. Therunqueue_lock
can now be unlocked. - If we are switching back to the same task (
next == prev
) then we can simply reacquire the global kernel lock and return, i.e. skip all the hardware-level (registers, stack etc.) and VM-related (switch page directory, recalculateactive_mm
etc.) stuff. - The macro
switch_to()
is architecture specific. On i386, it is concerned with a) FPU handling, b) LDT handling, c) reloading segment registers, d) TSS handling and e) reloading debug registers.
2.4 Linux linked list implementation
Before we go on to examine implementation of wait queues, we must
acquaint ourselves with the Linux standard doubly-linked list implementation.
Wait queues (as well as everything else in Linux) make heavy use
of them and they are called in jargon "list.h implementation" because the
most relevant file is include/linux/list.h
.
The fundamental data structure here is struct list_head
:
struct list_head {
struct list_head *next, *prev;
};
#define LIST_HEAD_INIT(name) { &(name), &(name) }
#define LIST_HEAD(name) \
struct list_head name = LIST_HEAD_INIT(name)
#define INIT_LIST_HEAD(ptr) do { \
(ptr)->next = (ptr); (ptr)->prev = (ptr); \
} while (0)
#define list_entry(ptr, type, member) \
((type *)((char *)(ptr)-(unsigned long)(&((type *)0)->member)))
#define list_for_each(pos, head) \
for (pos = (head)->next; pos != (head); pos = pos->next)
The first three macros are for initialising an empty list by pointing both
next
and prev
pointers to itself. It is obvious from C syntactical
restrictions which ones should be used where - for example, LIST_HEAD_INIT()
can be used for structure's element initialisation in declaration, the second
can be used for static variable initialising declarations and the third can
be used inside a function.
The macro list_entry()
gives access to individual list element, for example
(from fs/file_table.c:fs_may_remount_ro()
):
struct super_block {
...
struct list_head s_files;
...
} *sb = &some_super_block;
struct file {
...
struct list_head f_list;
...
} *file;
struct list_head *p;
for (p = sb->s_files.next; p != &sb->s_files; p = p->next) {
struct file *file = list_entry(p, struct file, f_list);
do something to 'file'
}
A good example of the use of list_for_each()
macro is in the scheduler where
we walk the runqueue looking for the process with highest goodness:
static LIST_HEAD(runqueue_head);
struct list_head *tmp;
struct task_struct *p;
list_for_each(tmp, &runqueue_head) {
p = list_entry(tmp, struct task_struct, run_list);
if (can_schedule(p)) {
int weight = goodness(p, this_cpu, prev->active_mm);
if (weight > c)
c = weight, next = p;
}
}
Here, p->run_list
is declared as struct list_head run_list
inside
task_struct
structure and serves as anchor to the list. Removing an element
from the list and adding (to head or tail of the list) is done by
list_del()/list_add()/list_add_tail()
macros. The examples below are adding
and removing a task from runqueue:
static inline void del_from_runqueue(struct task_struct * p)
{
nr_running--;
list_del(&p->run_list);
p->run_list.next = NULL;
}
static inline void add_to_runqueue(struct task_struct * p)
{
list_add(&p->run_list, &runqueue_head);
nr_running++;
}
static inline void move_last_runqueue(struct task_struct * p)
{
list_del(&p->run_list);
list_add_tail(&p->run_list, &runqueue_head);
}
static inline void move_first_runqueue(struct task_struct * p)
{
list_del(&p->run_list);
list_add(&p->run_list, &runqueue_head);
}
2.5 Wait Queues
When a process requests the kernel to do something which is currently impossible but that may become possible later, the process is put to sleep and is woken up when the request is more likely to be satisfied. One of the kernel mechanisms used for this is called a 'wait queue'.
Linux implementation allows wake-on semantics using TASK_EXCLUSIVE
flag.
With waitqueues, you can either use a well-known queue and then simply
sleep_on/sleep_on_timeout/interruptible_sleep_on/interruptible_sleep_on_timeout
,
or you can define your own waitqueue and use add/remove_wait_queue
to add and
remove yourself from it and wake_up/wake_up_interruptible
to wake up
when needed.
An example of the first usage of waitqueues is interaction between the page
allocator (in mm/page_alloc.c:__alloc_pages()
) and the kswapd
kernel daemon (in
mm/vmscan.c:kswap()
), by means of wait queue kswapd_wait,
declared in
mm/vmscan.c
; the kswapd
daemon sleeps on this queue, and it is woken up
whenever the page allocator needs to free up some pages.
An example of autonomous waitqueue usage is interaction between
user process requesting data via read(2) system call and kernel running in
the interrupt context to supply the data. An interrupt handler might look
like (simplified drivers/char/rtc_interrupt()
):
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rtc_wait);
void rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
spin_lock(&rtc_lock);
rtc_irq_data = CMOS_READ(RTC_INTR_FLAGS);
spin_unlock(&rtc_lock);
wake_up_interruptible(&rtc_wait);
}
So, the interrupt handler obtains the data by reading from some
device-specific I/O port (CMOS_READ()
macro turns into a couple outb/inb
) and
then wakes up whoever is sleeping on the rtc_wait
wait queue.
Now, the read(2) system call could be implemented as:
ssize_t rtc_read(struct file file, char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
unsigned long data;
ssize_t retval;
add_wait_queue(&rtc_wait, &wait);
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
do {
spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
data = rtc_irq_data;
rtc_irq_data = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
if (data != 0)
break;
if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
retval = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
if (signal_pending(current)) {
retval = -ERESTARTSYS;
goto out;
}
schedule();
} while(1);
retval = put_user(data, (unsigned long *)buf);
if (!retval)
retval = sizeof(unsigned long);
out:
current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
remove_wait_queue(&rtc_wait, &wait);
return retval;
}
What happens in rtc_read()
is this:
- We declare a wait queue element pointing to current process context.
- We add this element to the
rtc_wait
waitqueue. - We mark current context as
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
which means it will not be rescheduled after the next time it sleeps. - We check if there is no data available; if there is we break out,
copy data to user buffer, mark ourselves as
TASK_RUNNING
, remove ourselves from the wait queue and return - If there is no data yet, we check whether the user specified non-blocking I/O
and if so we fail with
EAGAIN
(which is the same asEWOULDBLOCK
) - We also check if a signal is pending and if so inform the "higher layers" to restart the system call if necessary. By "if necessary" I meant the details of signal disposition as specified in sigaction(2) system call.
- Then we "switch out", i.e. fall asleep, until woken up by the
interrupt handler. If we didn't mark ourselves as
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
then the scheduler could schedule us sooner than when the data is available, thus causing unneeded processing.
It is also worth pointing out that, using wait queues, it is rather easy to implement the poll(2) system call:
static unsigned int rtc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
unsigned long l;
poll_wait(file, &rtc_wait, wait);
spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock);
l = rtc_irq_data;
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
if (l != 0)
return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
return 0;
}
All the work is done by the device-independent function poll_wait()
which does
the necessary waitqueue manipulations; all we need to do is point it to the
waitqueue which is woken up by our device-specific interrupt handler.
2.6 Kernel Timers
Now let us turn our attention to kernel timers. Kernel timers are used to
dispatch execution of a particular function (called 'timer handler') at a
specified time in the future. The main data structure is struct timer_list
declared in include/linux/timer.h
:
struct timer_list {
struct list_head list;
unsigned long expires;
unsigned long data;
void (*function)(unsigned long);
volatile int running;
};
The list
field is for linking into the internal list, protected by the
timerlist_lock
spinlock. The expires
field is the value of jiffies
when
the function
handler should be invoked with data
passed as a parameter.
The running
field is used on SMP to test if the timer handler is currently
running on another CPU.
The functions add_timer()
and del_timer()
add and remove a given timer to the
list. When a timer expires, it is removed automatically. Before a timer is
used, it MUST be initialised by means of init_timer()
function. And before it
is added, the fields function
and expires
must be set.
2.7 Bottom Halves
Sometimes it is reasonable to split the amount of work to be performed inside an interrupt handler into immediate work (e.g. acknowledging the interrupt, updating the stats etc.) and work which can be postponed until later, when interrupts are enabled (e.g. to do some postprocessing on data, wake up processes waiting for this data, etc).
Bottom halves are the oldest mechanism for deferred execution of kernel tasks and have been available since Linux 1.x. In Linux 2.0, a new mechanism was added, called 'task queues', which will be the subject of next section.
Bottom halves are serialised by the global_bh_lock
spinlock, i.e.
there can only be one bottom half running on any CPU at a time. However,
when attempting to execute the handler, if global_bh_lock
is not available,
the bottom half is marked (i.e. scheduled) for execution - so processing can
continue, as opposed to a busy loop on global_bh_lock
.
There can only be 32 bottom halves registered in total. The functions required to manipulate bottom halves are as follows (all exported to modules):
-
void init_bh(int nr, void (*routine)(void))
: installs a bottom half handler pointed to byroutine
argument into slotnr
. The slot ought to be enumerated ininclude/linux/interrupt.h
in the formXXXX_BH
, e.g.TIMER_BH
orTQUEUE_BH
. Typically, a subsystem's initialisation routine (init_module()
for modules) installs the required bottom half using this function. -
void remove_bh(int nr)
: does the opposite ofinit_bh()
, i.e. de-installs bottom half installed at slotnr
. There is no error checking performed there, so, for exampleremove_bh(32)
will panic/oops the system. Typically, a subsystem's cleanup routine (cleanup_module()
for modules) uses this function to free up the slot that can later be reused by some other subsystem. (TODO: wouldn't it be nice to have/proc/bottom_halves
list all registered bottom halves on the system? That meansglobal_bh_lock
must be made read/write, obviously) -
void mark_bh(int nr)
: marks bottom half in slotnr
for execution. Typically, an interrupt handler will mark its bottom half (hence the name!) for execution at a "safer time".
Bottom halves are globally locked tasklets, so the question "when are bottom
half handlers executed?" is really "when are tasklets executed?". And the
answer is, in two places: a) on each schedule()
and b) on each
interrupt/syscall return path in entry.S
(TODO: therefore, the schedule()
case is really boring - it like adding yet another very very slow interrupt,
why not get rid of handle_softirq
label from schedule()
altogether?).
2.8 Task Queues
Task queues can be though of as a dynamic extension to old bottom halves. In fact, in the source code they are sometimes referred to as "new" bottom halves. More specifically, the old bottom halves discussed in previous section have these limitations:
- There are only a fixed number (32) of them.
- Each bottom half can only be associated with one handler function.
- Bottom halves are consumed with a spinlock held so they cannot block.
So, with task queues, arbitrary number of functions can be chained and
processed one after another at a later time. One creates a new task queue
using the DECLARE_TASK_QUEUE()
macro and queues a task onto it using
the queue_task()
function. The task queue then can be processed using
run_task_queue()
. Instead of creating your own task queue (and
having to consume it manually) you can use one of Linux' predefined
task queues which are consumed at well-known points:
- tq_timer: the timer task queue, run on each timer interrupt
and when releasing a tty device (closing or releasing a half-opened
terminal device). Since the timer handler runs in interrupt context,
the
tq_timer
tasks also run in interrupt context and thus cannot block. - tq_scheduler: the scheduler task queue, consumed by the scheduler (and also
when closing tty devices, like
tq_timer
). Since the scheduler executed in the context of the process being re-scheduled, thetq_scheduler
tasks can do anything they like, i.e. block, use process context data (but why would they want to), etc. - tq_immediate: this is really a bottom half
IMMEDIATE_BH
, so drivers canqueue_task(task, &tq_immediate)
and thenmark_bh(IMMEDIATE_BH)
to be consumed in interrupt context. - tq_disk: used by low level block device access (and RAID) to start the actual requests. This task queue is exported to modules but shouldn't be used except for the special purposes which it was designed for.
Unless a driver uses its own task queues, it does not need to call
run_tasks_queues()
to process the queue, except under circumstances explained
below.
The reason tq_timer/tq_scheduler
task queues are consumed not only in the
usual places but elsewhere (closing tty device is but one example) becomes
clear if one remembers that the driver can schedule tasks on the queue, and these tasks
only make sense while a particular instance of the device is still valid
- which usually means until the application closes it. So, the driver may
need to call run_task_queue()
to flush the tasks it (and anyone else) has
put on the queue, because allowing them to run at a later time may make no
sense - i.e. the relevant data structures may have been freed/reused by a
different instance. This is the reason you see run_task_queue()
on tq_timer
and tq_scheduler
in places other than timer interrupt and schedule()
respectively.
2.9 Tasklets
Not yet, will be in future revision.
2.10 Softirqs
Not yet, will be in future revision.
2.11 How System Calls Are Implemented on i386 Architecture?
There are two mechanisms under Linux for implementing system calls:
- lcall7/lcall27 call gates;
- int 0x80 software interrupt.
Native Linux programs use int 0x80 whilst binaries from foreign flavours of UNIX (Solaris, UnixWare 7 etc.) use the lcall7 mechanism. The name 'lcall7' is historically misleading because it also covers lcall27 (e.g. Solaris/x86), but the handler function is called lcall7_func.
When the system boots, the function arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:trap_init()
is
called which sets up the IDT so that vector 0x80 (of type 15, dpl 3) points to
the address of system_call entry from arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
.
When a userspace application makes a system call, the arguments are passed via registers
and the application executes 'int 0x80' instruction. This causes a trap into
kernel mode and processor jumps to system_call entry point in entry.S
.
What this does is:
- Save registers.
- Set %ds and %es to KERNEL_DS, so that all data (and extra segment) references are made in kernel address space.
- If the value of %eax is greater than
NR_syscalls
(currently 256), fail withENOSYS
error. - If the task is being ptraced (
tsk->ptrace & PF_TRACESYS
), do special processing. This is to support programs like strace (analogue of SVR4 truss(1)) or debuggers. - Call
sys_call_table+4*(syscall_number from %eax)
. This table is initialised in the same file (arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
) to point to individual system call handlers which under Linux are (usually) prefixed withsys_
, e.g.sys_open
,sys_exit
, etc. These C system call handlers will find their arguments on the stack whereSAVE_ALL
stored them. - Enter 'system call return path'. This is a separate label because it
is used not only by int 0x80 but also by lcall7, lcall27. This is
concerned with handling tasklets (including bottom halves), checking
if a
schedule()
is needed (tsk->need_resched != 0
), checking if there are signals pending and if so handling them.
Linux supports up to 6 arguments for system calls. They are passed in
%ebx, %ecx, %edx, %esi, %edi (and %ebp used temporarily, see _syscall6()
in
asm-i386/unistd.h
). The system call number is passed via %eax.
2.12 Atomic Operations
There are two types of atomic operations: bitmaps and atomic_t
. Bitmaps are
very convenient for maintaining a concept of "allocated" or "free" units
from some large collection where each unit is identified by some number, for
example free inodes or free blocks. They are also widely used for simple
locking, for example to provide exclusive access to open a device. An example
of this can be found in arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c
:
/*
* Bits in microcode_status. (31 bits of room for future expansion)
*/
#define MICROCODE_IS_OPEN 0 /* set if device is in use */
static unsigned long microcode_status;
There is no need to initialise microcode_status
to 0 as BSS is zero-cleared
under Linux explicitly.
/*
* We enforce only one user at a time here with open/close.
*/
static int microcode_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
return -EPERM;
/* one at a time, please */
if (test_and_set_bit(MICROCODE_IS_OPEN, µcode_status))
return -EBUSY;
MOD_INC_USE_COUNT;
return 0;
}
The operations on bitmaps are:
- void set_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr): set bit
nr
in the bitmap pointed to byaddr
. - void clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr): clear bit
nr
in the bitmap pointed to byaddr
. - void change_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr): toggle bit
nr
(if set clear, if clear set) in the bitmap pointed to byaddr
. - int test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr):
atomically set bit
nr
and return the old bit value. - int test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr):
atomically clear bit
nr
and return the old bit value. - int test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr):
atomically toggle bit
nr
and return the old bit value.
These operations use the LOCK_PREFIX
macro, which on SMP kernels evaluates to
bus lock instruction prefix and to nothing on UP. This guarantees atomicity
of access in SMP environment.
Sometimes bit manipulations are not convenient, but instead we need to perform
arithmetic operations - add, subtract, increment decrement. The typical cases
are reference counts (e.g. for inodes). This facility is provided by the
atomic_t
data type and the following operations:
- atomic_read(&v): read the value of
atomic_t
variablev
. - atomic_set(&v, i): set the value of
atomic_t
variablev
to integeri
. - void atomic_add(int i, volatile atomic_t *v): add integer
i
to the value of atomic variable pointed to byv
. - void atomic_sub(int i, volatile atomic_t *v): subtract
integer
i
from the value of atomic variable pointed to byv
. - int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, volatile atomic_t *v):
subtract integer
i
from the value of atomic variable pointed to byv
; return 1 if the new value is 0, return 0 otherwise. - void atomic_inc(volatile atomic_t *v): increment the value by 1.
- void atomic_dec(volatile atomic_t *v): decrement the value by 1.
- int atomic_dec_and_test(volatile atomic_t *v): decrement the value; return 1 if the new value is 0, return 0 otherwise.
- int atomic_inc_and_test(volatile atomic_t *v): increment the value; return 1 if the new value is 0, return 0 otherwise.
- int atomic_add_negative(int i, volatile atomic_t *v): add
the value of
i
tov
and return 1 if the result is negative. Return 0 if the result is greater than or equal to 0. This operation is used for implementing semaphores.
2.13 Spinlocks, Read-write Spinlocks and Big-Reader Spinlocks
Since the early days of Linux support (early 90s, this century), developers were faced with the classical problem of accessing shared data between different types of context (user process vs interrupt) and different instances of the same context from multiple cpus.
SMP support was added to Linux 1.3.42 on 15 Nov 1995 (the original patch was made to 1.3.37 in October the same year).
If the critical region of code may be executed by either process context
and interrupt context, then the way to protect it using cli/sti
instructions
on UP is:
unsigned long flags;
save_flags(flags);
cli();
/* critical code */
restore_flags(flags);
While this is ok on UP, it obviously is of no use on SMP because the same
code sequence may be executed simultaneously on another cpu, and while cli()
provides protection against races with interrupt context on each CPU individually, it
provides no protection at all against races between contexts running on different
CPUs. This is where spinlocks are useful for.
There are three types of spinlocks: vanilla (basic), read-write and
big-reader spinlocks. Read-write spinlocks should be used when there is a
natural tendency of 'many readers and few writers'. Example of this is
access to the list of registered filesystems (see fs/super.c
). The list is
guarded by the file_systems_lock
read-write spinlock because one needs exclusive
access only when registering/unregistering a filesystem, but any process can
read the file /proc/filesystems
or use the sysfs(2) system call to force a
read-only scan of the file_systems list. This makes it sensible to use
read-write spinlocks. With read-write spinlocks, one can have multiple
readers at a time but only one writer and there can be no readers while
there is
a writer. Btw, it would be nice if new readers would not get a lock while
there
is a writer trying to get a lock, i.e. if Linux could correctly deal with
the issue of potential writer starvation by multiple readers.
This would mean that readers must be blocked while there is a writer
attempting to get the lock. This is not
currently the case and it is not obvious whether this should be fixed - the
argument to the contrary is - readers usually take the lock for a very short
time so should they really be starved while the writer takes the lock for
potentially longer periods?
Big-reader spinlocks are a form of read-write spinlocks heavily optimised for very light read access, with a penalty for writes. There is a limited number of big-reader spinlocks - currently only two exist, of which one is used only on sparc64 (global irq) and the other is used for networking. In all other cases where the access pattern does not fit into any of these two scenarios, one should use basic spinlocks. You cannot block while holding any kind of spinlock.
Spinlocks come in three flavours: plain, _irq()
and _bh()
.
- Plain
spin_lock()/spin_unlock()
: if you know the interrupts are always disabled or if you do not race with interrupt context (e.g. from within interrupt handler), then you can use this one. It does not touch interrupt state on the current CPU. -
spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq()
: if you know that interrupts are always enabled then you can use this version, which simply disables (on lock) and re-enables (on unlock) interrupts on the current CPU. For example,rtc_read()
usesspin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock)
(interrupts are always enabled insideread()
) whilstrtc_interrupt()
usesspin_lock(&rtc_lock)
(interrupts are always disabled inside interrupt handler). Note thatrtc_read()
usesspin_lock_irq()
and not the more genericspin_lock_irqsave()
because on entry to any system call interrupts are always enabled. -
spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore()
: the strongest form, to be used when the interrupt state is not known, but only if interrupts matter at all, i.e. there is no point in using it if our interrupt handlers don't execute any critical code.
The reason you cannot use plain spin_lock()
if you race against interrupt handlers is because if you take it and then
an interrupt comes in on the same CPU, it will busy wait for the lock forever:
the lock holder, having been interrupted, will not continue until the
interrupt handler returns.
The most common usage of a spinlock is to access a data structure shared between user process context and interrupt handlers:
spinlock_t my_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
my_ioctl()
{
spin_lock_irq(&my_lock);
/* critical section */
spin_unlock_irq(&my_lock);
}
my_irq_handler()
{
spin_lock(&lock);
/* critical section */
spin_unlock(&lock);
}
There are a couple of things to note about this example:
- The process context, represented here as a typical driver method -
ioctl()
(arguments and return values omitted for clarity), must usespin_lock_irq()
because it knows that interrupts are always enabled while executing the deviceioctl()
method. - Interrupt context, represented here by
my_irq_handler()
(again arguments omitted for clarity) can use plainspin_lock()
form because interrupts are disabled inside an interrupt handler.
2.14 Semaphores and read/write Semaphores
Sometimes, while accessing a shared data structure, one must perform operations that can block, for example copy data to userspace. The locking primitive available for such scenarios under Linux is called a semaphore. There are two types of semaphores: basic and read-write semaphores. Depending on the initial value of the semaphore, they can be used for either mutual exclusion (initial value of 1) or to provide more sophisticated type of access.
Read-write semaphores differ from basic semaphores in the same way as read-write spinlocks differ from basic spinlocks: one can have multiple readers at a time but only one writer and there can be no readers while there are writers - i.e. the writer blocks all readers and new readers block while a writer is waiting.
Also, basic semaphores can be interruptible - just use the operations
down/up_interruptible()
instead of the plain down()/up()
and check the
value returned from down_interruptible()
: it will be non zero if the operation was
interrupted.
Using semaphores for mutual exclusion is ideal in situations where a critical code section may call by reference unknown functions registered by other subsystems/modules, i.e. the caller cannot know apriori whether the function blocks or not.
A simple example of semaphore usage is in kernel/sys.c
, implementation of
gethostname(2)/sethostname(2) system calls.
asmlinkage long sys_sethostname(char *name, int len)
{
int errno;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if (len < 0 || len > __NEW_UTS_LEN)
return -EINVAL;
down_write(&uts_sem);
errno = -EFAULT;
if (!copy_from_user(system_utsname.nodename, name, len)) {
system_utsname.nodename[len] = 0;
errno = 0;
}
up_write(&uts_sem);
return errno;
}
asmlinkage long sys_gethostname(char *name, int len)
{
int i, errno;
if (len < 0)
return -EINVAL;
down_read(&uts_sem);
i = 1 + strlen(system_utsname.nodename);
if (i > len)
i = len;
errno = 0;
if (copy_to_user(name, system_utsname.nodename, i))
errno = -EFAULT;
up_read(&uts_sem);
return errno;
}
The points to note about this example are:
- The functions may block while copying data from/to userspace in
copy_from_user()/copy_to_user()
. Therefore they could not use any form of spinlock here. - The semaphore type chosen is read-write as opposed to basic because there may be lots of concurrent gethostname(2) requests which need not be mutually exclusive.
Although Linux implementation of semaphores and read-write semaphores is very sophisticated, there are possible scenarios one can think of which are not yet implemented, for example there is no concept of interruptible read-write semaphores. This is obviously because there are no real-world situations which require these exotic flavours of the primitives.
2.15 Kernel Support for Loading Modules
Linux is a monolithic operating system and despite all the modern hype about some "advantages" offered by operating systems based on micro-kernel design, the truth remains (quoting Linus Torvalds himself):
... message passing as the fundamental operation of the OS is just an
exercise in computer science masturbation. It may feel good, but you
don't actually get anything DONE.
Therefore, Linux is and will always be based on a monolithic design, which means that all subsystems run in the same privileged mode and share the same address space; communication between them is achieved by the usual C function call means.
However, although separating kernel functionality into separate "processes"
as is done in micro-kernels is definitely a bad idea, separating it into
dynamically loadable on demand kernel modules is desirable in some
circumstances (e.g. on machines with low memory or for installation kernels
which could otherwise contain ISA auto-probing device drivers that are
mutually exclusive). The decision whether to include support for loadable
modules is made at compile time and is determined by the CONFIG_MODULES
option. Support for module autoloading via request_module()
mechanism is
a separate compilation option (CONFIG_KMOD
).
The following functionality can be implemented as loadable modules under Linux:
- Character and block device drivers, including misc device drivers.
- Terminal line disciplines.
- Virtual (regular) files in
/proc
and in devfs (e.g./dev/cpu/microcode
vs/dev/misc/microcode
). - Binary file formats (e.g. ELF, aout, etc).
- Execution domains (e.g. Linux, UnixWare7, Solaris, etc).
- Filesystems.
- System V IPC.
There a few things that cannot be implemented as modules under Linux (probably because it makes no sense for them to be modularised):
- Scheduling algorithms.
- VM policies.
- Buffer cache, page cache and other caches.
Linux provides several system calls to assist in loading modules:
caddr_t create_module(const char *name, size_t size)
: allocatessize
bytes usingvmalloc()
and maps a module structure at the beginning thereof. This new module is then linked into the list headed by module_list. Only a process withCAP_SYS_MODULE
can invoke this system call, others will getEPERM
returned.long init_module(const char *name, struct module *image)
: loads the relocated module image and causes the module's initialisation routine to be invoked. Only a process withCAP_SYS_MODULE
can invoke this system call, others will getEPERM
returned.long delete_module(const char *name)
: attempts to unload the module. Ifname == NULL
, attempt is made to unload all unused modules.long query_module(const char *name, int which, void *buf, size_t bufsize, size_t *ret)
: returns information about a module (or about all modules).
The command interface available to users consists of:
- insmod: insert a single module.
- modprobe: insert a module including all other modules it depends on.
- rmmod: remove a module.
- modinfo: print some information about a module, e.g. author, description, parameters the module accepts, etc.
Apart from being able to load a module manually using either insmod or modprobe,
it is also possible to have the module inserted automatically by the kernel
when a particular functionality is required. The kernel interface for this
is the function called request_module(name)
which is exported to modules,
so that modules can load other modules as well. The request_module(name)
internally creates a kernel thread which execs the userspace command
modprobe -s -k module_name, using the standard exec_usermodehelper()
kernel
interface (which is also exported to modules). The function returns 0 on
success, however it is usually not worth checking the return code from
request_module()
. Instead, the programming idiom is:
if (check_some_feature() == NULL)
request_module(module);
if (check_some_feature() == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
For example, this is done by fs/block_dev.c:get_blkfops()
to load a module
block-major-N
when attempt is made to open a block device with major N
.
Obviously, there is no such module called block-major-N
(Linux developers
only chose sensible names for their modules) but it is mapped to a proper
module name using the file /etc/modules.conf
. However, for most well-known
major numbers (and other kinds of modules) the modprobe/insmod commands
know which real module to load without needing an explicit alias statement
in /etc/modules.conf
.
A good example of loading a module is inside the mount(2) system call. The
mount(2) system call accepts the filesystem type as a string which
fs/super.c:do_mount()
then passes on to fs/super.c:get_fs_type()
:
static struct file_system_type *get_fs_type(const char *name)
{
struct file_system_type *fs;
read_lock(&file_systems_lock);
fs = *(find_filesystem(name));
if (fs && !try_inc_mod_count(fs->owner))
fs = NULL;
read_unlock(&file_systems_lock);
if (!fs && (request_module(name) == 0)) {
read_lock(&file_systems_lock);
fs = *(find_filesystem(name));
if (fs && !try_inc_mod_count(fs->owner))
fs = NULL;
read_unlock(&file_systems_lock);
}
return fs;
}
A few things to note in this function:
- First we attempt to find the filesystem with the given name amongst
those already registered. This is done under protection of
file_systems_lock
taken for read (as we are not modifying the list of registered filesystems). - If such a filesystem is found then we attempt to get a new reference
to it by trying to increment its module's hold count. This always
returns 1 for statically linked filesystems or for modules not
presently being deleted. If
try_inc_mod_count()
returned 0 then we consider it a failure - i.e. if the module is there but is being deleted, it is as good as if it were not there at all. - We drop the
file_systems_lock
because what we are about to do next (request_module()
) is a blocking operation, and therefore we can't hold a spinlock over it. Actually, in this specific case, we would have to dropfile_systems_lock
anyway, even ifrequest_module()
were guaranteed to be non-blocking and the module loading were executed in the same context atomically. The reason for this is that the module's initialisation function will try to callregister_filesystem()
, which will take the samefile_systems_lock
read-write spinlock for write. - If the attempt to load was successful, then we take the
file_systems_lock
spinlock and try to locate the newly registered filesystem in the list. Note that this is slightly wrong because it is in principle possible for a bug in modprobe command to cause it to coredump after it successfully loaded the requested module, in which caserequest_module()
will fail even though the new filesystem will be registered, and yetget_fs_type()
won't find it. - If the filesystem is found and we are able to get a reference to it, we return it. Otherwise we return NULL.
When a module is loaded into the kernel, it can refer to any symbols that
are exported as public by the kernel using EXPORT_SYMBOL()
macro or by
other currently loaded modules. If the module uses symbols from another
module, it is marked as depending on that module during dependency
recalculation, achieved by running depmod -a command on boot (e.g. after
installing a new kernel).
Usually, one must match the set of modules with the version of the kernel
interfaces they use, which under Linux simply means the "kernel version" as
there is no special kernel interface versioning mechanism in general.
However, there is a limited functionality called "module versioning" or
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
which allows to avoid recompiling modules when switching
to a new kernel. What happens here is that the kernel symbol table is treated
differently for internal access and for access from modules. The elements of
public (i.e. exported) part of the symbol table are built by 32bit
checksumming the C declaration. So, in order to resolve a symbol used by a
module during loading, the loader must match the full representation of the
symbol that includes the checksum; it will refuse to load the module if these
symbols differ. This
only happens when both the kernel and the module are compiled with module
versioning enabled. If either one of them uses the original symbol names,
the loader simply tries to match the kernel version declared by the module
and the one exported by the kernel and refuses to load if they differ.
Next Previous Contents